Loading…
For estate and letting agents
The first agent to answer usually gets the instruction.
Answer first, book the viewing while they are still interested, and keep the pipeline visible.
Estate and letting agency is a speed business dressed up as a relationship business. The relationship matters enormously once you have the instruction, but getting it very often comes down to who replied first. An applicant browsing a portal at nine in the evening will send four enquiries, and by lunchtime the next day they have booked with whoever came back with a time.
Then the work turns into chasing. Every sale is a queue of people waiting on other people, and the agent is the only party with any incentive to keep it moving. Every let is a set of documents, checks and deadlines that have to be collected from people who are busy, distracted and moving house.
Almost none of that requires clever software. It requires that nothing falls between two people, that the paperwork is collected once and stored properly, and that the office can see at a glance what every live case is waiting on. Most agencies are one step away from that; the step is usually getting it out of individual inboxes.
Sound familiar?
- Portal enquiries arriving in bulk, with the fastest reply winning the viewing
- Viewings arranged over three phone calls each, then rearranged twice
- Chasing solicitors, lenders and the other end of a chain for updates nobody volunteers
- Compliance paperwork, identity checks and deposit protection with hard deadlines and manual tracking
What we do about it
- Every portal and website enquiry into one place, acknowledged instantly, allocated to somebody by name
- Viewings booked from live availability, confirmed and reminded, with feedback captured afterwards
- One board showing every sale and let in progress, what it is waiting on and who is chasing it
- Identity documents and paperwork collected through a secure portal, tracked to a deadline rather than a memory
A day that probably looks like yours
Nothing here is a disaster. That is rather the point: this is an ordinary day, and the cost is spread so thinly that nobody ever adds it up.
- 08:05Overnight portal enquiries are in three different inboxes.The best applicant sent theirs at nine last night and has already booked elsewhere.
- 09:50Arranging a viewing takes calls to the applicant, the vendor and the tenant in situ.Half an hour of negotiation for one twenty minute viewing.
- 11:30A vendor rings for an update on their sale.Nobody knows without ringing the solicitor, so you promise to call back and forget.
- 13:15A tenant's identity documents arrive as photographs in a personal email.Sensitive documents sitting in an inbox, with no record of what was checked and when.
- 15:45A deposit needs protecting within the deadline and is tracked on a spreadsheet.One person's memory standing between the agency and a genuine problem.
- 18:20Viewing feedback from the afternoon is in a negotiator's notebook.The vendor rings tomorrow and hears nothing useful, and starts wondering about the fee.
Speed of reply decides more instructions than anything else
Portal enquiries are bought and paid for, which makes a slow reply an expensive habit. The applicant who sends four enquiries at nine in the evening is not comparing agents on service quality, because they have not experienced any yet. They are comparing on who got back to them, and often on who got back first.
The practical answer has two parts. An immediate acknowledgement that is genuinely useful, offering viewing times or asking the one or two questions that let you help properly, so the applicant feels attended to within minutes. Then a real human conversation at the next sensible opportunity, which is where the actual relationship starts.
Underneath that, every enquiry from every source has to arrive in one place with an owner's name on it. The most common loss in an agency is not a bad reply, it is an enquiry sitting in a shared inbox that three people assumed a fourth person had picked up.
Viewings without three phone calls each
Arranging a single viewing can involve an applicant, a vendor, a tenant in occupation and a negotiator with a car, and each of those has a different set of constraints. Doing that by telephone, one call at a time, is why viewing arrangement quietly consumes so much of the working day.
Booking from live availability changes the shape of it. The applicant picks from times that already work, confirmations go out to everyone who needs one, and reminders reduce the wasted journeys to properties nobody turns up at. Rearranging becomes a change everybody sees rather than another round of calls.
Capturing feedback immediately afterwards is the part that pays for itself with vendors. A short structured note taken on a phone at the door, rather than written up in a notebook and typed on Friday, means the vendor update is honest, current and prompt. Vendors rarely leave agents who keep them genuinely informed.
The pipeline everyone can see
Between agreed and completed, a sale is a series of waits: searches, survey, mortgage offer, enquiries raised, the other end of the chain. Very little of it moves on its own, and nobody except the agent has both the overview and the motivation to push it.
A single board showing every live case, its stage, what it is waiting on and who is chasing it turns that from individual heroics into a process. Anybody in the office can answer a vendor's question without ringing a solicitor first, and the case does not stall because the negotiator handling it is on holiday.
It also makes the chasing regular rather than reactive. Most stalled transactions are not blocked by anything dramatic; they are waiting on somebody who has not been asked this week. A prompt at sensible intervals, from a list rather than from memory, keeps more sales alive to completion.
Paperwork, identity checks and personal data
Agency work generates a steady flow of other people's most sensitive documents: passports, driving licences, bank statements, references, tenancy agreements. In a great many offices these arrive as photographs attached to ordinary emails and stay there, in personal inboxes, indefinitely.
Collecting them through a secure portal instead is better on every count. The client uploads once, from their phone, and gets chased automatically if something is missing. The documents sit somewhere access controlled rather than in an inbox. There is a record of what was received and when, and there is a defensible answer if anybody ever asks how the information was handled.
The deadline driven items deserve the same treatment. Deposit protection, right to rent checks, safety certificates and renewal dates all have consequences if missed, and all are commonly tracked on a spreadsheet that one person maintains. Moving them into a system with reminders removes a category of risk that has nothing to do with how good the agency is at selling houses.
Real examples
Illustrative cases drawn from the kind of work we do. Tap one to see what happened and what could have been done. We do not name clients without their permission.
The evening enquiries answered the next afternoon
The case
An agency paid substantial monthly fees to the major portals and could not understand why its conversion from enquiry to viewing was poor. Most enquiries arrived in the evening and went into a shared inbox that was worked through the following morning, by which point applicants had booked with faster agents.
What could have been done
An immediate, genuinely helpful automatic reply offering viewing slots, plus a single inbox with a named owner for every enquiry, keeps the applicant engaged until a person can call properly. The portal spend stays the same and produces more viewings.
The vendor who never got an update
The case
A vendor with a property on the market for six weeks had eleven viewings and received feedback on four of them, always after ringing to ask. The feedback existed, in negotiators' notebooks and heads, but it was never assembled into anything the vendor received.
What could have been done
Capturing structured feedback on a phone at the end of each viewing, and sending the vendor a regular summary automatically, keeps them informed without anyone writing a report. Most instructions that move to another agent move over silence rather than over price.
The identity documents in a personal inbox
The case
A letting department collected tenant identity and financial documents by email, so passports and bank statements for hundreds of applicants sat in individual staff mailboxes going back years, including those of people who had left the company.
What could have been done
Moving document collection to a secure portal, with automatic chasing and a clear record of what was received, takes sensitive personal data out of ordinary inboxes. Combined with removing access when staff leave, it closes an exposure that most agencies do not realise they are carrying.
What estate and letting agents usually ask us for
VoIP and cloud telephony
Business phone systems that follow your team anywhere. Number porting, call routing, voicemail to email, and call recording where you need it.
£18 to £35/user/month
Custom CRM and business systems
The system you actually need rather than the one you can rent. Built around your process, integrated with what you already use.
£20,000 to £40,000
Document processing
Invoices, delivery notes, timesheets and forms read automatically and filed where they belong, with a person checking the edge cases.
£800 to £1,500/month
Website design and build
Fast, accessible sites that load in under two seconds and read well on a phone. Built to be edited by you, not held hostage by us.
£4,000 to £8,000
Local SEO and Google Business
Get found by the people down the road who are ready to buy. We fix your Google Business Profile, get your Name, Address and Phone matching everywhere, and win the map pack that sits above the normal results.
£500 to £1,200/month
Common questions
We already have agency software. Do we need something else?
Often not something else, just more of what you have. Most agency systems do considerably more than the office uses, particularly around automated communication and pipeline tracking. We would look at what you already pay for before proposing anything new, and if the answer is to use it properly, that is what we will say.
Does an automatic reply to enquiries not feel impersonal?
It depends entirely on what it says. A message that acknowledges the specific property, offers times and asks a sensible question reads as attentive. A generic thank you for your enquiry reads as a machine. The automatic reply is there to hold the applicant's interest for the hour or two until a person can call, not to replace the person.
Can this help with compliance deadlines?
It can track them and remind you about them, which is usually where things go wrong. What it cannot do is decide what your obligations are, and we would not pretend otherwise. The rules are a matter for you and your professional advisers or redress scheme. The system's job is to make sure nothing is missed through forgetfulness.
Our negotiators are out all day. Does this work on a phone?
It has to. Viewing feedback, applicant notes and diary changes are worth almost nothing if they wait until somebody is back at a desk. The parts used out of the office should be quick to complete standing on a doorstep in the rain, which is the honest test.
We are a two office independent, not a national chain. Is this proportionate?
Independents often gain more from it, because there is no head office absorbing the admin and the same people are valuing, viewing and chasing. The starting point is usually enquiry handling and the pipeline board, because those two produce a visible difference quickly and cost little.
Not quite your trade?
Plumbers and heating engineersElectriciansSalons and barbersGarages and MOT centresAccountants and bookkeepersContact centres and sales teamsBuilders and construction firmsJoiners and carpentersLandscapers and grounds maintenanceCleaning and facilities companiesDental practices and clinicsCafes, restaurants and takeawaysCare homes and home care providers
Admin Rescue for estate and letting agents
A job management system built around how you actually work. Missed calls text back automatically, quotes go out in minutes, and everything lands in your accounts software without you retyping it.
from £2,400 setup then £150/month